The Prescience of The Exorcist

Dappled Things, Saints Peter & Paul issue, 2025

I. Discernment

At the 1974 Academy Awards, tuxedoed host David Niven prepared to introduce Elizabeth Taylor to announce the year’s Best Picture winner. “If one reads the newspapers or listens to the news,” he said in his exquisite, Received Pronunciation English, “it is quite obvious that the whole world is having a nervous breakdown.” Thirty seconds later a streaker ran across the stage.

But was it a nervous breakdown the world was having, or something darker? Either way, its proximate cause may have been one of that night’s Best Picture nominees, The Exorcist. The first horror movie ever nominated for the award, it lost to The Sting, and the two films could hardly have been more different. The Sting is a lighthearted look back at pre-World-War-II America, featuring Scott Joplin’s wonderfully playful 1902 Ragtime song “The Entertainer.” The Exorcist’s theme, “Tubular Bells,” sounds like a beacon of impending doom. And while 1974’s Best Picture winner is not well remembered today, The Exorcist feels more relevant than ever, a big bang from which our present culture has expanded, parts of it as frightening as the movie.

Audiences began lining up to see it in droves after its December 26, 1973 release. Many left before the film ended, some on their backs. People fainted, vomited, and in New York a woman was said to have miscarried. I was six years old at the time and living in tiny Waldo, Arkansas, and though I wouldn’t see it for years even I remember the frenzy. No other movie in my lifetime has produced such a visceral reaction. It arguably transcended not only its genre but cinema itself.

Catholics, who had been consulted heavily during production, seemed to be of two minds. They disparaged the film’s violence and sexual grotesquery while lauding its spiritual seriousness and portrayal of two Jesuit priests as heroes. The U.S. Conference of Catholic Bishops gave it an A-4 rating as “morally unobjectionable for adults, with reservations.”

Protestant leaders, on the other hand, recoiled. Billy Graham, the closest thing Protestantism had to a pope, called it “spiritual pornography.” As for the secular world, Roger Ebert was deeply impressed with the film’s craftsmanship, awarding it four out of four stars. But he could hardly believe it had not been rated X. “Are people so numb,” he wrote, “they need movies of this intensity in order to feel anything at all?”

He didn’t know nothing yet. The years since The Exorcist have seen an explosion of extreme sex and violence onscreen, which have recalibrated audience tolerance levels and rendered the original’s effects mainstream by today’s standards. Nonetheless, for me its frights still hold up, and have even gained a new dimension. The movie was eerily prescient, like a crystal ball through which those 1970s audiences had glimpsed America’s future, that of their children and grandchildren, and freaked out…

Click here to access the full essay at Dappled Things

How the West Won the Money Race

American Institute for Economic Research, March 15, 2024

When Marco Polo arrived in Yuan Dynasty China, among the wonders he found was that money grew on trees. His travelog tells how the Emperor Kublai Khan’s mint in present-day Beijing processed the cambium layer of mulberry trees—a soft, sticky substance found between the wood and the bark—into “something resembling sheets of paper.” These were cut into rectangles and marked with an imperial seal made from cinnabar. Just like that, paper money was born…

Click Here to Read

Where Have You Gone, Alex P. Keaton?

American Institute for Economic Research, November 30, 2023

One of the most popular sitcoms of the 1980s, Family Ties, featured two ex-hippies raising a family in the era of Ronald Reagan.  Their eldest son Alex, played by a young Michael J. Fox, was an unabashed, necktie-wearing conservative who idolized Milton Friedman and excelled academically. Alex was, of course, an economics major…

Click Here to Read

Calculus and Christ in Denton, Texas

Dappled Things, Mary Queen of Angels issue, 2022

At the town of Centreville, Highway 7 and Interstate 45 intersect perpendicularly, like geometric number lines drawn on Texas in cement. On a July day in 1995, I crossed this origin in a 1978 Buick LeSabre sedan, a lime-green rectangle 18-feet-long and filled with most of what I owned in the world. I’d bought it from my uncle the year before as part of a plan to lower my living expenses. While it won me no style points on the street, my uncle took meticulous care of his rides, and I knew “The Bomb” (what I once heard my cousin sarcastically call it) would move me reliably from point A to B. On this day, point A was Houston, where I’d spent most of my life. Point B was Denton, north of Dallas, where I was moving to start graduate school at the University of North Texas.

The climate transitioned as I drove north. Away from the massive heat-sink of the Gulf of Mexico, the temperature rose and the air dried, and I liked the change. Houston summers could be swampy and damp. Sometimes you weren’t sure if you were breathing or drowning. The sky also looked different in North Texas, a smooth concave surface that seemed to expand over the course of my drive. It didn’t occur to me at the time, but taking the land I was traveling through as a Cartesian plane, I was surrounded physically by the same things that would soon surround me mentally in my coursework—lines, curves and geometric shapes—fundamental elements of calculus.

Six years earlier, I’d graduated from Texas A&M University with a bachelor’s degree in economics. I’d been twenty-one physically, maybe fifteen emotionally…

Click here to access the full essay at Dappled Things